FINANCIAL
TIMES
America Must Show It's Lasting Interest in Asia Policy
By Matthew Goodman
19 November 2004
Barely three weeks after winning a fresh mandate, George W. Bush and
his new foreign policy team will have a chance this weekend to start shaping
their second-term priorities when the US president meets 20 other leaders
at the annual Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation summit in Santiago, Chile.
A plethora of pressing regional concerns - North Korea, terrorism, trade
and currency frictions - will demand Mr Bush's attention but the summit
is also an opportunity to reassert America's long-term leadership in Asia.
Asia policy has been one of the relative foreign policy successes of
Mr Bush's first term. The administration has established a constructive
relationship with China while strengthening ties with Japan, producing
a rare period in which Washington enjoyed good relations with both regional
powers. The White House has also worked to strengthen alliances and economic
engagement with south-east Asian countries.
North Korea is the one area where the administration has arguably made
a bad situation worse through early belligerence and refusal to negotiate
directly on North Korea's nuclear weapons programme. But the White House
did devise a creative multi-party framework for dialogue in north-east
Asia that could have lasting institutional significance. There are also
important longer-term challenges in Asia facing Mr Bush. While Asian leaders
have been relatively supportive of US policies on terrorism and Iraq,
they have found it increasingly difficult to defend US action in the face
of growing popular hostility, especially in majority Muslim countries
such as Indonesia and Malaysia. Paradoxically, this hostility is accompanied
by anxiety about US disengagement from Asia at a time when China appears
to moving inexorably towards regional hegemony.
For the most part, Asian countries welcome the opportunities presented
by a rising China, particularly those that flow from its rapid economic
growth. Beijing has encouraged these sentiments by launching a regional
charm offensive, offering trade concessions, co-operating in regional
forums and downplaying territorial disputes.
But China's neighbours are not naive. As Muhammad Noordin Sopiee of Malaysia's
Institute of Strategic and International Studies said in a recent press
interview, other Asians sometimes see the "glint of steel" behind
Beijing's friendly gestures. This highlights both the risk to the US of
yielding regional leadership to China and an opportunity for the US to
solidify its position in the region as a "hedge" against Chinese
domination.
In Santiago, Mr Bush can do three things to demonstrate America's commitment
to Asia. First, he can inject new energy and focus into Apec itself. For
all its flaws, this is the only forum in which the US president regularly
meets his Asia-Pacific counterparts.
The forum does unheralded but useful work to facilitate regional trade,
investment and co-operation in important areas such as health, micro-
enterprise finance and security. But, after 15 years, Apec's agenda has
become too diffuse and its processes too unwieldy. The president should
propose a dramatic streamlining of the organisation to make it more responsive
to leaders' priorities in promoting regional prosperity and security.
Second, Mr Bush should reach out to his south-east Asian counterparts
by proposing a free trade area between the US and the important group
of countries on China's southern rim. With China, Japan and Korea all
negotiating their own FTAs with the south-east Asian bloc, it is time
the US followed suit. The strategic benefits of such an initiative, which
would solidify US ties with the region, could be even greater than its
economic policy significance.
Finally, in his bilateral meeting with his Chinese counterpart, Mr Bush
should propose a new, high-level economic dialogue between the two countries.
Given China's growing role in the global economy, the two countries need
a standing cabinet-level forum co-chaired by top White House officials
and Chinese counterparts to maximise the scope for bilateral co-operation
and minimise the risks of friction.
The White House has had little time to prepare a robust agenda for this
year's Apec meeting due to the election. But the region's challenges,
from the threat of nuclear proliferation to the rise of China, will not
wait for next year. The president and his new team should take advantage
of this rare meeting of Asia-Pacific leaders to reaffirm America's long-term
commitment to this vital region.
Return to Prior Years News 
Return to In the News 
Back to Top^
About | Services
| Expertise | Publications
| News | Partners
|